http://www.bostonglobe.com/magazine/2014/02/02/boston-should-stop-chasing-its-olympic-dreams/iVMbbRfIwUE6vcQxzGCknL/story.html#
On the night
of the Opening Ceremonies of the Winter Olympics in Sochi, I want to take a
look at Boston’s bid for the 2024 Summer Olympics and push back against some of
the claims made by Shira Springer of the Boston
Globe.
Springer
lays out the same argument made by many observers of the Olympic Games: namely,
that they are very expensive and offer too little in terms of long-term
economic development.
However,
Springer—like others who denigrate the economic effect of the Games—fails to
understand that the lasting legacy of well-run Olympics (like London 2012) is not empty stadiums (London’s Olympic
Stadium will soon be filled with a team from the Barclay’s Premier League, its
aquatics center is now a world-class community facility, and several of its
other arenas have been packed up and sent to Rio de Janeiro for use in 2016).
Rather, the lasting legacy is the infrastructure—specifically,
transportation and housing—that is built for the participants in and spectators
of the Games.
Springer
notes that London spent $15 billion on the Games. But what if I told you that
nearly $12 billion of that sum was spent on transformative, permanent
improvements to London’s transit network, including:
·
Four new or renovated subway lines
·
Dedicated express rail connections between
Heathrow Airport and Central London
·
High-speed rail links between East London and
Continental Europe
·
Dozens of new bike/pedestrian routes (which
paved the way for London’s version of the HubWay to take off in 2010)
These
investments—which will support London’s economy for generations to come—would not have been made had London not
hosted the Games.
In Boston,
we look at our rickety old subway system and wonder if we will ever be able to
build out a true 21st century transit network in the Hub. The fact
is that plans for subway expansion in Metro-Boston—from the Blue Line to
Central Square-Lynn (first discussed in a 1926 report) to the quixotic
effort to build a Silver Line subway (first discussed in 1948)– have gone
nowhere for 25 years—since the last Red Line stations opened from Harvard
Square to Alewife and the Orange Line extended to Forest Hills.
The Olympics
would be a catalyst for those investments, as well as improvements at North and
South Stations (including the ever-elusive connection between the two hubs),
spurred on by the need to move visitors between venues (such as the TD Garden
and the Olympic Stadium—which would be perched on the waterfront).
Boston’s
Olympic legacy wouldn’t end with transformative transportation projects.
Rather, just as London has used the Olympic village to boost affordable
housing, so Boston—desperately in need of additional housing stock—would
benefit from thousands of units build for the world’s greatest athletes, but
intended for Boston’s families.
Lastly, let
us not discount the great civic pride that comes with hosting the world for a
fortnight. Londoners of all stripes volunteered with spirit to welcome people
from all corners of the Globe to their City.
So it would
be in Beantown, where baseball’s cathedral would host soccer; the ancient polo
fields in my hometown of Hamilton would be the showcase for equestrian (with
the Romney’s attendance an essential component); the Charles River, always
packed with rowers in October, would host the world’s best sculls; the ancient
stone horseshoe of Harvard Stadium would be lit up by world class field hockey;
the windy waters of Marblehead as the perfect setting for sailing; the
brilliant sand of Singing Beach in Manchester for beach volleyball; and the
26.2 miles from Hopkinton to Copley Square providing the backdrop to the
greatest Olympic Marathon of all time.
So here’s to
Sochi 2014…and Boston 2024.
No comments:
Post a Comment